Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2016; 22(11): 3220-3226
Published online Mar 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i11.3220
Published online Mar 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i11.3220
n (%) | ||
Size | < 5 mm | 19 (47.5) |
5 ≥ and < 10 mm | 12 (30.0) | |
≥ 10 mm | 9 (22.5) | |
Type | Sessile | 23 (57.5) |
Semi pedunculated | 8 (20.0) | |
Pedunculated | 5 (12.5) | |
LST | 4 (10.0) | |
Location | Rectum | 3 (7.5) |
Sigmoid colon | 8 (20.0) | |
Descending colon | 7 (17.5) | |
Transverse colon | 9 (22.5) | |
Ascending colon | 11 (27.5) | |
Cecum | 2 (5.0) | |
Histology | TA with LGD | 27 (67.5) |
TA with HGD | 3 (7.5) | |
Chronic colitis | 6 (15.0) | |
Serrated polyp | 3 (7.5) | |
Inflammatory polyp | 1 (2.5) |
- Citation: Kim JH, Park SJ, Lee JH, Kim TO, Kim HJ, Kim HW, Lee SH, Baek DH, (BIGS) BUGISGS. Is forceps more useful than visualization for measurement of colon polyp size? World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(11): 3220-3226
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i11/3220.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i11.3220