Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2016; 22(10): 3031-3037
Published online Mar 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.3031
Published online Mar 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.3031
Table 3 Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient values and tumor diameter changes
Correlation | r value | P value |
Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values before treatment vs mean maximum tumor diameter | 0.124 | 0.108 |
ADC values 2 wk after treatment vs mean maximum tumor diameter after 2 wk of treatment | 0.093 | 0.183 |
ADC values after 12 wk of treatment vs mean maximum tumor diameter after 12 wk of treatment | 0.052 | 0.118 |
ADC values before treatment vs reduced percentage of the mean maximum tumor diameter after 12 wk of treatment | -0.718 | 0.001 |
Increased percentage of ADC values after 12 wk of treatment vs reduced percentage of maximum tumor diameter | 0.742 | 0.002 |
Percent decrease in tumor size vs mean maximum diameter of metastatic tumors before treatment | -0.015 | 0.279 |
- Citation: Zheng DX, Meng SC, Liu QJ, Li CT, Shang XD, Zhu YS, Bai TJ, Xu SM. Predicting liver metastasis of gastrointestinal tract cancer by diffusion-weighted imaging of apparent diffusion coefficient values. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(10): 3031-3037
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i10/3031.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.3031