Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2016; 22(10): 3031-3037
Published online Mar 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.3031
Published online Mar 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.3031
Table 1 Comparison of clinical data between the effective and ineffective groups
Groups | Average age (yr) | Maximum tumor diameter (cm) | ||
Before treatment | After 2 wk of treatment | After 12 wk of treatment | ||
Effective group (n = 73) | 57.7 ± 5.9 | 3.45 ± 0.81 | 3.29 ± 0.75 | 1.87 ± 0.38 |
Ineffective group (n = 83) | 59.6 ± 6.2 | 3.62 ± 0.85 | 3.47 ± 0.88 | 3.45 ± 0.62 |
t value | 1.953 | 1.274 | 1.365 | 18.874 |
P value | 0.053 | 0.205 | 0.174 | 0 |
- Citation: Zheng DX, Meng SC, Liu QJ, Li CT, Shang XD, Zhu YS, Bai TJ, Xu SM. Predicting liver metastasis of gastrointestinal tract cancer by diffusion-weighted imaging of apparent diffusion coefficient values. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(10): 3031-3037
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i10/3031.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.3031