Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2016; 22(10): 2993-3005
Published online Mar 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.2993
Table 2 Potential prognostic variables and their class scores in hepatocellular carcinomas patients
VariablesDefinitionClass scores1
X1SexMale (1), Female (2)
X2Age (yr)18-60 (1), ≥ 60 (2)
X3Pathological gradeWell-Moderate differentiated (1), Poor-differentiated (2)
X4Etiology of cirrhosisHBV (1), HCV (2), Alcohol (3), Others (4)
X5Portal vein hypertensionNo (1), Yes (2)
X6Liver function enzymeNormal (1), Elevated (2)
(serum AST/ALT)
X7Child-Pugh classificationA (1), B (2), C (3)
X8Serum AFP (ng/mL)Normal < 20 (1), Abnormal ≥ 20 (2)
X9CEUS pre-RFANo (1), Yes (2)
X10Number of tumorsSingle (1), ≥ 2 (2)
X11Tumor size (cm) ≤ 3.0 (1), 3.0-5.0 (2)
X12Risky locationNo (1), Yes (2)
X13Type of RFA electrodesUmbrella (1), single (2)
X14Primary technical successYes (0), No (1)
X15Number of RFA sessions1 (0), ≥ 2 (1)