Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2016; 22(1): 155-164
Published online Jan 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i1.155
Published online Jan 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i1.155
Ref. | Laboratory parameter | HBV patients vs controls statistical significance | HBV patients vs controls |
Su et al[19] | Total cholesterol | P < 0.05 | 181.7 ± 29.8 mg/dL vs 186.8 ± 33.3 mg/dL |
LDL-C | NS | 108.7 ± 25.9 mg/dL vs 109.4 ± 28.6 mg/dL | |
HDL-C | P < 0.01 | 53.4 ± 11.6 mg/dL vs 56.5 ± 13.5 mg/dL | |
TG | NS | 99.2 ± 54.0 mg/dL vs 102.7 ± 57.6 mg/dL | |
Jan et al[6] | TG | OR = 0.64 (0.60-0.69) | |
HDL-C | OR = 0.89 (0.80-0.99) | ||
Luo et al[7] | TG | OR = 0.62 (0.53-0.72); P = 0.002 | |
HDL-C | NS | ||
Chen et al[20] | Cholesterol | P < 0.001 | |
TG | P < 0.001 | ||
Wong et al[8] | Total cholesterol | P = 0.004 | 4.9 ± 0.8 mmol/L vs 5.2 ± 1.0 mmol/L |
LDL-C | NS | 2.9 ± 0.8 mmol/L vs 3.0 ± 0.9 mmol/L | |
HDL-C | NS | 1.5 ± 0.4 mmol/L vs 1.5 ± 0.4 mmol/L | |
TG | P = 0.027 | 1.0 (0.1-2.9) mmol/L vs 1.1 (0.3-21.3) mmol/L | |
Hsu et al[21] | LDL-C | NS | |
HDL-C | aOR = 0.004 (0.001-0.017); P < 0.0011 | ||
TG | aOR = 0.107 (0.054-0.213); P < 0.0011 | ||
Li et al[9] | Total cholesterol ≤ 45 yr in women | P < 0.001 | 178 mg/dL vs 174 mg/dL |
Total cholesterol > 45 yr in women | P = 0.040 | 201 mg/dL vs 205 mg/dL | |
LDL-C ≤ 45 yr in women | P = 0.040 | 103.5 mg/dL vs 101.2 mg/dL | |
LDL-C > 45 yr in women | NS | 123.6 mg/dL vs 126.8 mg/dL | |
HDL-C ≤ 45 yr in women | P < 0.001 | 63.3 mg/dL vs 61.5 mg/dL | |
HDL-C > 45 yr in women | NS | 60.1 mg/dL vs 59.4 mg/dL | |
TG ≤ 45 yr in women | NS | 67 mg/dL vs 67 mg/dL | |
TG > 45 yr in women | P < 0.001 | 85 mg/dL vs 93 mg/dL | |
Total cholesterol ≤ 45 yr in men | NS | 183 mg/dL vs 182 mg/dL | |
Total cholesterol > 45 yr in men | P < 0.001 | 188 mg/dL vs 197 mg/dL | |
LDL-C ≤ 45 yr in men | NS | 49.8 mg/dL vs 49.7 mg/dL | |
LDL-C > 45 yr in men | P < 0.001 | 117.6 mg/dL vs 123 mg/dL | |
HDL-C ≤ 45 yr in men | NS | 51 mg/dL vs 51 mg/dL | |
HDL-C > 45 yr in men | NS | 49.8 mg/dL vs 49.7 mg/dL | |
TG ≤ 45 yr in men | P = 0.017 | 100 mg/dL vs 104 mg/dL | |
TG > 45 yr in men | P < 0.001 | 102 mg/dL vs 116 mg/dL | |
Liu et al[22] | Total cholesterol | P < 0.05 | 193 ± 36 mg/dL vs 197 ± 36 mg/dL |
LDL-C | P < 0.05 | 124 ± 31 mg/dL vs 126 ± 36 mg/dL | |
HDL-C | NS | 53 ± 16 mg/dL vs 53 ± 16 mg/L | |
TG | NS | 126 ± 129 mg/dL vs 131 ± 87 mg/dL | |
Chung et al[10] | TG in men | P < 0.001 | 4.59 ± 0.48 mg/dL vs 4.75 ± 0.52 mg/dL |
HDL-C in men | P = 0.039 | 3.81 ± 0.26 mg/dL vs 3.84 ± 0.25 mg/dL | |
TG in women | NS | 4.45 ± 0.30 mg/dL vs 4.50 ± 0.50 mg/dL | |
HDL-C in women | NS | 4.01 ± 0.20 mg/dL vs 3.97 ± 0.24 mg/dL | |
Jinjuvadia et al[11] | TG | NS (total, in men, in women) | |
HDL-C (total) | OR = 0.37 (0.15-0.91) | ||
HDL-C in men | NS | ||
HDL C in women | OR = 0.26 (0.07-0.93) | ||
Jarčuška et al[13] | Total cholesterol | P = 0.001 | 4.54 ± 0.84 mmol/L vs 5.00 ± 0.99 mmol/L |
LDL –C | P = 0.001 | 2.29 ± 0.58 mmol/L vs 2.60 ± 0.68 mmol/L | |
HDL-C | NS | 1.19 ± 0.35 mmol/L vs 1.19 ± 0.41mmol/L | |
TG | NS | 1.11 ± 0.59 mmol/L vs 1.31 ± 0.91 mmol/L | |
ApoB100 | P = 0.013 | 0.71 ± 0.21 g/L vs 0.77 ± 0.23 g/L | |
Janicko et al[14] | Total cholesterol | P = 0.035 | 4.45 ± 1.21 mmol/L vs 4.71 ± 1.23 mmol/L |
LDL –C | NS | 2.20 ± 0.88 mmol/L vs 2.50 ± 0.90 mmol/L | |
HDL-C | NS | 1.10 ± 0.53 mmol/L vs 1.10 ± 0.36 mmol/L | |
TG | NS | 1.02 ± 1.56 mmol/L vs 1.15 ± 1.75 mmol/L | |
ApoB100 | P = 0.025 | 0.66 ± 0.26 g/L vs 0.74 ± 0.29 g/L | |
Choi et al[15] | TG in men | OR = 0.63 (0.40-0.99); P = 0.043 | |
HDL-C in men | NS | ||
TG in women | OR = 0.34 (0.17-0.69); P = 0.003 | ||
HDL-C in women | NS |
- Citation: Jarcuska P, Drazilova S, Fedacko J, Pella D, Janicko M. Association between hepatitis B and metabolic syndrome: Current state of the art. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(1): 155-164
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i1/155.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i1.155