Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2015; 21(8): 2522-2533
Published online Feb 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2522
Table 4 Studies not included in meta-analysis
Ref.RegionPublicationParticipantsH. pylori infection Initial diagnosis⁄re-checkingInventions (duration)CasesFollow-up (wk)Eradication rate by ITTFirst or second or three line therapy1
Graham et al[22], 1993United StatesFull textPeptic ulcerUBT and histology/UBT and histologyBAT 1416443%1
Lobo et al[19], 1994United KingdomFull textNRhistology or culture /histology and cultureOAT 21 vs BT 28+M 1417/26458% vs 65%1
Auriemma et al[34], 2001ItalyAbstractNRNR/UBTOAT 763NR77.3%2
Perri et al[35], 2002ItalyFull textDyspepsiaHistology and RUT/UBTLAT 7 vs RBCAT 7 vs LAD 789/88/874-635% vs 20% vs 36%1
Cammarota et al[25], 2004ItalyFull textNRCulture/UBTOBTA 789891%3
Sezgin et al[38],2007TurkeyFull textDyspepsia or peptic ulcerHistology and RUT and UBT/UBTPA 7-PMT 732450%1
Buzás et al[39], 2008HungaryFull textDuodenal ulcerhistology and RUT/UBTPATN 14 vs PATB 1422/19662% vs 55%3
Akyildiz et al[42], 2009TurkeyFull textNRHistology and RUT/UBTRBCAT 14/RBCAT 1458/57634.5% vs 36.8%1
Cetinkaya et al[26], 2010TurkeyFull textNonulcer dyspepsiaHistology/UBTPA 5- PTM 9 vs PA5-PATM 956/56682%/79%1
Ataseven et al[43], 2010TurkeyFull text2-type Diabetes mellitus with H. pyloriHistology and RUT/UBTPA 7-PTM 738458%1
Zhang[49], 2012ChinaFull textNRRUT and UBT/UBTEBAT1201 mo93%2
Tursi1 et al[52], 2012ItalyFull textpeptic ulcer or gastritis or duodenitisNR/RUT or UBTPPI+A 5 - PPI+Le+T 51191 mo67%3
Uygun et al[53], 2012TurkeyFull textnonulcerdyspepsiaHistology/UBTPBA 7 - PBTM 714245 d81%1
Kadayifci et al[48], 2012TurkeyFull textnon-ulcerdyspepsiaHistology and UBT/UBTEBAT 14/EATM 14100/100679%/74%1
Liou et al[54], 2013TaiwanFull textNRUBT or two of RUT, histology and cultureEA 7- EMC 7 vs EA 7-EMT 7 vs EA 7 - EMLe 719/65/51≥ 680%/71%/92%3