Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2015; 21(8): 2483-2489
Published online Feb 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2483
Published online Feb 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2483
Table 1 Patients’ characteristics
| Characteristics | Group A | Group B |
| n | 71 | 72 |
| Age (yr) | 57.5 | 60.2 |
| Gender (M:F) | 44:27 | 46:26 |
| Indication | ||
| Early esophageal cancer | 3 | 1 |
| Early gastric cancer. | 39 | 36 |
| Gastric adenoma | 10 | 15 |
| Gastric maltoma | 3 | 1 |
| Gastric/duodenal subepithelial lesion | 14 | 14 |
| Gastric polyp or erosion | 3 | 4 |
| Location of lesion | ||
| Esophagus | 3 | 1 |
| Gastric cardia | 0 | 1 |
| Stomach upper body | 13 | 8 |
| Stomach midbody | 0 | 1 |
| Stomach lower body | 17 | 19 |
| Gastric angle | 7 | 14 |
| Gastric antrum | 32 | 27 |
- Citation: Kim GH, Cho YK, Cha JM, Lee SY, Chung IK. Effect of pronase as mucolytic agent on imaging quality of magnifying endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(8): 2483-2489
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i8/2483.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2483