Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2015; 21(8): 2294-2302
Published online Feb 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2294
Published online Feb 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2294
Protocol | CR | CFS | OS | DFS | |
A | RT | 54%[29] | 32% lower colostomy-free rate than C[28] | 14% higher death rate than C[27] | 12.9% higher death and relapse rates at 5 yr than C[27] |
B | RT + 5-FU | NA | 71%[29] | No significant difference from C | 51%[29] |
C | RT + 5-FU + Mitomycin | 80%[29]89.6% at 26 wk[34] | 59%[28] | 78.3% at 5 yr[32,33] | 67.8%[29,30]to 73%[29] |
D | RT + 5-FU + Cisplatin | 90.5% at 26 wk[34] | NA | 70.7% at 5 yr[31,32] | 57.8%[31,32] |
- Citation: Ghosn M, Kourie HR, Abdayem P, Antoun J, Nasr D. Anal cancer treatment: Current status and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(8): 2294-2302
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i8/2294.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2294