Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2015; 21(7): 2131-2139
Published online Feb 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i7.2131
Published online Feb 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i7.2131
No actual appendiceal perforation (n = 1146) | Actual appendiceal perforation (n = 90) | P value | |
Grade 1, n (%) | 5 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) | 1.000 |
Renal dysfunction | 1 | 0 | |
Hepatitis | 1 | 0 | |
Hyperamylasemia | 3 | 0 | |
Grade 2, n (%) | 94 (8.2) | 13 (14.4) | 0.051 |
Wound infection | 72 | 8 | |
Urinary retention | 11 | 1 | |
Delayed gastric emptying | 6 | 2 | |
Pneumonia | 2 | 0 | |
Pleural effusion | 2 | 2 | |
Renal dysfunction | 1 | 0 | |
Grade 3, n (%) | 14 (1.2) | 7 (7.8) | |
Intra-abdominal abscess | 9 | 5 | |
Intestinal obstruction (ileus) | 4 | 2 | |
Intra-abdominal hemorrhage | 1 | 0 | |
Severe complications (grade 3-4), n (%) | 14 (1.2) | 7 (7.8) | < 0.001 |
Total complications, n (%) | 113 (9.9) | 20 (22.2) | 0.014 |
- Citation: Lee SC, Park G, Choi BJ, Kim SJ. Determination of surgical priorities in appendicitis based on the probability of undetected appendiceal perforation. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(7): 2131-2139
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i7/2131.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i7.2131