Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2015; 21(5): 1641-1649
Published online Feb 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1641
Table 3 Meta-analysis results of -1790G>A polymorphism
Dominant comparison
Allele comparison
Heterozygote comparison
OR (95%CI)PhetOR (95%CI)PhetOR (95%CI)Phet
Overall3.252 (1.661-6.368)1< 0.0014.455 (1.938-10.241)1< 0.0012.677 (1.677-4.273)1< 0.001
Ethnicity
Caucasian1.882 (0.627-5.644)< 0.0012.881 (0.943-8.807)0.0091.898 (0.411-8.761)0.002
Asian2.921 (1.909-4.470)10.1632.793 (1.877-4.158)10.1952.891 (1.890-4.422)10.165
Source of control
HB3.258 (1.331-7.977)1< 0.0014.904 (1.375-17.489)1< 0.0012.521 (1.526-4.167)10.094
PB3.516 (1.340-9.229)10.0263.923 (1.894-8.128)10.0842.729 (0.823-9.053)10.011
Cancer types
OC7.919 (1.582-39.636)1< 0.0019.663 (1.312-71.149)1< 0.0013.165 (1.264-7.924)10.019
PC2.499 (0.929-6.726)0.0983.030 (1.946-4.716)10.4181.611 (0.241-10.760)0.019
CRC0.971 (0.571-1.650)0.454
Sample size
Small4.127 (1.511-11.267)1< 0.0014.976 (1.457-16.996)1< 0.0012.351 (1.180-4.682)10.007
Large2.186 (0.863-5.537)0.0013.313 (2.214-4.959)10.9693.492 (2.298-5.307)10.690