Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2015; 21(5): 1573-1579
Published online Feb 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1573
Published online Feb 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1573
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis of influencing factors on the computed tomography attenuation values of ascites
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||
| Coefficient (95%CI) | P value | Coefficient (95%CI) | P value | |
| Perforation site | 8.86 (1.49-16.24) | 0.020 | 7.39 (1.60-13.19) | 0.014 |
| Amount of ascites | -0.09 (-0.04-0.02) | 0.513 | ||
| Reason of perforation | 1.57 (-4.64-7.77) | 0.614 | ||
| Ascites accumulated site | 1.48 (-2.01-4.97) | 0.397 | ||
| Intravenous contrast | 5.10 (-4.61-14.80) | 0.296 | ||
| Time from onset | -0.03 (-0.14-0.09) | 0.656 | ||
- Citation: Seishima R, Okabayashi K, Hasegawa H, Tsuruta M, Hoshino H, Yamada T, Kitagawa Y. Computed tomography attenuation values of ascites are helpful to predict perforation site. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(5): 1573-1579
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i5/1573.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1573