Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2015; 21(5): 1546-1553
Published online Feb 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1546
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patients n (% of procedures)
CharacteristicSIF-Y0004-V01 (n = 50)SIF-Y0004 (n = 34)P valueAll SBE-assisted ERCP (n = 84)
Reconstruction method
Roux-en-Y gastrectomy34 (68)29 (85)0.12463 (75)
Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy16 (32)5 (17)21 (25)
Age, (yr) (mean ± SD)71.4 ± 9.270.0 ± 11.00.52970.8 ± 9.9
Sex
Male40 (80)31 (91)0.16871 (85)
Female10 (20)3 (9)13 (15)
Reasons for surgery
Gastric ulcer0 (0)1 (3)0.2181 (1)
Duodenum ulcer0 (0)2 (6)0.0802 (2)
Carcinoma of the stomach32 (64)25 (73)0.38757 (68)
Malignant lymphoma of the stomach2 (4)0 (0)0.2382 (2)
Carcinoma of the duodenum1 (2)0 (0)0.4071 (1)
Tumors of the pancreas
Carcinoma of the pancreas3 (6)0 (0)0.1463 (4)
SCN1 (2)0 (0)0.4071 (1)
NET1 (2)0 (0)0.4071 (1)
Tumors of the biliary tract
Carcinoma of the bile duct4 (8)0 (0)0.0914 (5)
IPNB2 (4)3 (9)0.3455 (6)
Pancreaticobiliary maljunction2 (4)1 (3)0.8093 (4)
Congenital choledochal cyst0 (0)1 (3)0.2181 (1)
Other2 (4)1 (3)0.8093 (4)
Reasons for ERCP
AOSC (due to CBD stone)0 (0)2 (6)0.0802 (2)
Pancreatitis (due to CBD stone)1 (2)0 (0)0.4071 (1)
CBD stone26 (52)21 (62)0.36547 (56)
Intrahepatic stone10 (20)3 (9)0.17213 (16)
Carcinoma of the pancreas2 (4)1 (3)0.8093 (4)
Carcinoma of the gallbladder1 (2)0 (0)0.4071 (1)
Cholangiocellular carcinoma3 (6)0 (0)0.1463 (4)
IPMN0 (0)2 (6)0.0802 (2)
IPNB2 (4)4 (12)0.1656 (7)
Pancreaticobiliary maljunction1 (2)0 (0)0.4071 (1)
Metastasis of L/n in porta hepatis0 (0)5 (15)0.0055 (6)
Stricture of the anastomotic site4 (8)0 (0)0.0914 (5)
Other1 (2)1 (3)0.7692 (2)
Other abdominal or pelvic surgery9 (18)10 (29)0.23619 (23)
Peritoneal metastasis0 (0)2 (6)0.0802 (3)