Clinical comparison of laparoscopy vs open surgery in a radical operation for rectal cancer: A retrospective case-control study

doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13532

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 21, Issue 48

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (7226)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-8) series.

Item

Count

PDF

656

WORD

323

HTML

3007

Figures (1-1)

175

Tables (1-8)

205

Sum=4366

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1027

Download

1833

Sum=2860

Dec 28, 2015 (publication date) through Oct 19, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (11)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2015; 21(48): 13532-13541
Published online Dec 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13532

Table 7 Economic costs of the operations

	LRR (n = 492)	ORR (n = 424)	P value
Operation fee (RMB)	13628 ± 6771	10761 ± 5056	< 0.001
Medication (RMB)	15859 ± 10203	17562 ± 7006	0.06
Total hospitalization (RMB)	40889 ± 19356	42381 ± 17915	0.234

LRR: Laparoscopy in radical resection; ORR: Open radical resection.

Citation: Huang C, Shen JC, Zhang J, Jiang T, Wu WD, Cao J, Huang KJ, Qiu ZJ. Clinical comparison of laparoscopy vs open surgery in a radical operation for rectal cancer: A retrospective case-control study. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(48): 13532-13541
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i48/13532.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13532