Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2015; 21(48): 13532-13541
Published online Dec 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13532
Published online Dec 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13532
Table 2 Surgery index
LRR (n = 492) | ORR (n = 424) | P value | |
Surgery duration (min) | 143.89 ± 50.865 | 164.86 ± 67.993 | < 0.001 |
Surgery bleeding (mL) | 111.54 ± 97.148 | 154.03 ± 154.545 | < 0.001 |
Maximum incision (cm) | 4.14 ± 0.738 | 13.8 ± 2.603 | < 0.001 |
Conversions to open | 12 (2.4%) | ||
Tumor diameter (cm) | 4.338 ± 1.6387 | 4.325 ± 1.8274 | 0.914 |
Sample length(cm) | 18.050 ± 5.1748 | 17.553 ± 5.7995 | 0.182 |
Proximal margin (cm) | 10.487 ± 4.2906 | 10.673 ± 5.2175 | 0.567 |
Distal margin (cm) | 3.214 ± 1.8727 | 2.873 ± 2.4913 | 0.022 |
Lymph nodes retrieved (unit) | 11.09 ± 6.503 | 10.68 ± 6.321 | 0.338 |
- Citation: Huang C, Shen JC, Zhang J, Jiang T, Wu WD, Cao J, Huang KJ, Qiu ZJ. Clinical comparison of laparoscopy vs open surgery in a radical operation for rectal cancer: A retrospective case-control study. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(48): 13532-13541
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i48/13532.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13532