Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2015; 21(48): 13518-13523
Published online Dec 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13518
Published online Dec 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13518
Table 2 Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection n (%)
| High risk group (n = 66) | Low risk group (n = 244) | P value | |
| Prodecure time (mean ± SD, min) | 50.5 ± 27.6 | 44.2 ± 29.7 | 0.12 |
| Resection type (en bloc) | 66 (100.0) | 244 (100.0) | |
| Lesion location | 0.004 | ||
| High body, cardia | 0 (0.0) | 10 (4.1) | |
| Mid body, lower body | 9 (13.6) | 9 (3.7) | |
| Antrum, angle | 57 (86.4) | 225 (92.2) | |
| Lesion characteristics | 0.006 | ||
| Elevated | 54 (81.8) | 227 (93.0) | |
| Flat or depressed | 12 (18.2) | 17 (7.0) | |
| Lesion size (maximum diameter) | 12.0 ± 7.3 | 12.5 ± 8.4 | 0.69 |
| Resected specimen size (maximum diameter) | 32.3 ± 9.4 | 30.7 ± 10.8 | 0.25 |
| Histologic type | 0.36 | ||
| Cancer | 20 (30.3) | 54 (22.1) | |
| High grade dysplasia | 6 (9.1) | 29 (11.9) | |
| Lower grade dysplasia | 40 (60.6) | 161 (66.0) | |
| Presence of Helicobacter pylori | 0.87 | ||
| Yes | 11 (16.7) | 36 (14.8) | |
| No | 54 (81.8) | 204 (83.6) | |
| Unknown | 1 (1.5) | 4 (1.6) | |
| Endoscopic hemostasis | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 66 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| No | 0 (0.0) | 244 (100.0) | |
| Occurrence of delayed bleeding | 0.38 | ||
| Yes | 1 (1.5) | 1 (0.4) | |
| No | 65 (98.5) | 243 (99.6) |
- Citation: Jung JH, Kim BJ, Choi CH, Kim JG. Second-look endoscopy with prophylactic hemostasis is still effective after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasm. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(48): 13518-13523
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i48/13518.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13518