Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2015; 21(48): 13518-13523
Published online Dec 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13518
Published online Dec 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13518
Table 1 Clinical characteristics before second look endoscopy according to the rebleeding risk after endoscopic submucosal dissection n (%)
| High risk group (n = 66) | Low risk group (n = 244) | P value | |
| Forrest classfication | Ia, Ib, IIa (21.2) | IIb, IIc, III (78.8) | |
| Ia (n = 0) | IIb (n = 55) | ||
| Ib (n = 48) | IIc (n = 14) | ||
| IIa (n = 18) | III (n = 175) | ||
| Age, mean (mean ± SD, yr) | 65.2 ± 8.6 | 64.7 ± 9.4 | 0.70 |
| Sex, male/female | 43/23 | 150/94 | 0.58 |
| Comorbidities (Charlson scale) | 0.96 | ||
| 0 | 49 (74.2) | 178 (73.0) | |
| 1 | 13 (19.7) | 52 (21.3) | |
| 2 | 3 (4.5) | 9 (3.7) | |
| 3 | 1 (1.5) | 3 (1.2) | |
| 4 | 0 (0) | 2 (0.8) | |
| Use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents or steroid or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs | 0.03 | ||
| Yes | 10 (15.2) | 17 (7.0) | |
| None or unknown | 56 (84.8) | 227 (93.0) |
- Citation: Jung JH, Kim BJ, Choi CH, Kim JG. Second-look endoscopy with prophylactic hemostasis is still effective after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasm. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(48): 13518-13523
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i48/13518.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13518