Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2015; 21(45): 12857-12864
Published online Dec 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i45.12857
Table 2 Operative results of patients who underwent laparoscopic common bile duct exploration n (%)
CL-LCBDE(n = 20)nSIL-CBDE(n = 20)P value
Operative time (skin to skin, min)0.007
mean ± SD192 ± 39238 ± 76
median (range)197.5 (115-245)215.0 (125-365)
Estimated blood loss (mL)132 ± 30975 ± 1610.101
Completion cholangiogram5 (25)0 (0)0.018
Completion choledochoscopy16 (80)20 (100)0.037
Stone clearance20 (100)20 (100)1.000
CBD stone0.348
Single CBD stone12 (60)9 (45)
Multiple CBD stones8 (40)11 (55)
Mean number of CBD stone extracted1.9 ± 1.73.0 ± 3.20.316
The largest diameter of CBD stone (mm)0.624
mean ± SD12.3 ± 3.814.1 ± 4.6
median (range)14.0 (5.0-15.8)13.6 (7.0-20.0)
Open conversion001.000
Addition of another port001.000
Gallbladder pathology0.234
Gangrene/empyema1 (5)4 (20)
Acute inflammation3 (15)3 (15)
Chronic inflammation16 (80)13 (65)
Drain placed19 (95)3 (15)< 0.001
Pethidine dose (mg/kg)92.5 ± 120.146.5 ± 63.50.010
Postoperative hospital stay (d)0.010
mean ± SD5.1 ± 1.73.8 ± 2.0
median (range)5.0 (2.0-8.0)3.0 (2.0-9.0)
Postoperative complication0.275
Infected subhepatic collection10
Minor bile leak01
Subhepatic seroma01