Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2015; 21(44): 12686-12695
Published online Nov 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i44.12686
Published online Nov 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i44.12686
Table 1 Types of studies and patient selection for transanal total mesorectal excision
| Author, year | Type of study | No. of patients | Median age (yr) | Gender ratio (M:F) | Median BMI (kg/m²) | Neoadjuvant therapy | Median distance from AV/DL (cm) |
| Zorron, 2010 | Prospective | 9 | 63 (range, 52-81) | 5:4 | NR | 4/9 | AV 7.5 (range, 4-12) |
| Dumont, 2012 | Prospective | 4 | 67 (range, 70-66) | 4:0 | 23 (range, 22-25) | NR | AV 5.3 (range, 4-7) |
| de Lacy, 2013 | Prospective | 20 | 65 ± 10.21 (range, 44-77) | 11:9 | 25 ± 3.8 (range, 19-33) | 14/20 | DL 6.5 ± 3.31 (range, 2-15) |
| Lacy, 2013 | Prospective | 3 | 73 (range, 71-75) | 1:2 | 22 (range, 16-25) | 2/3 | 9.7 (range, 9-10) |
| Rouanet, 2013 | Prospective | 30 | 65 (range, 43-82) | 30:0 | 26 (range, 21-32) | 29/30 | AV Low rectum (0-5 cm) 20/30; Middle rectum (5-10 cm) 10/30; Upper rectum (10-15 cm) 0/30 |
| Sylla, 2013 | Prospective | 5 | 49 ± 9.81 | 3:2 | 26 ± 2.3 | 2/5 | AV 5.7 (range, 4-10) |
| Atallah, 2014 | Prospective | 20 | 57 (range, 36-73) | 14:6 | 24 (range 18-41) | 17/20 | AV 5 (range 1-9) |
| Chen, 2014 | Prospective | 20 | 58 ± 10.11 | 11:9 | 25 ± 3 | 11/20 | AV 5.9 ± 1.7 (range, 2-8) |
| Chouillard, 2014 | Prospective | 16 | 58 (range, 34-81) | 6:10 | 28 (range, 21-38) | Yes | NR |
| Fernandez-Hevia, 2014 | Prospective Comparative | 37 | 65 ± 11.81 | 24:13 | 24 ± 3.6 (range, 18-31) | 27/37 | AV Middle rectum 8.1 ± 1.71; Low rectum 3.5 cm ± 1.21 |
| Kneist, 2014 | Prospective | 6 | 56 (range, 45-65) | 5:1 | 25 (range, 23-28) | 4/6 | DL 1.7 (range, 0-3) |
| Meng, 2014 | Prospective | 3 | 80 (range, 76-82) | 2:1 | NR | 1/3 | AV 4.3 (range, 4-5) |
| Tuech, 2014 | Prospective | 56 | 65 (range, 39-83) | 41:15 | 27 (range, 20-42) | 47/56 | AV 4 (range, 0-5) |
| Velthuis, 2014 | Prospective Case-Matched | 25 | 64 (range, 49-86) | 18:7 | 25 (range, 20-36) | 25/25 | AV 8 (range, 0-16) |
| Wolthuis, 2014 | Prospective | 7 | 65 (range, 38-87) | 6:1 | 25 (range, 17-32) | NR | NR |
| Atallah, 2015 | Retrospective | 4 | 45 (range, 26-59) | 3:1 | 31 (range, 21-38) | 3/4 | AV 3.3 (range, 1-4) |
| Gomez Ruiz, 2015 | Prospective | 5 | 53 (range, 38-67) | 4:1 | 26 (range, 22-31) | 4/5 | AV 5 (range, 4-6) |
| Knol, 2015 | Prospective | 10 | 61 (range 36-70) | 8:2 | 27 (range 22-34) | 10/10 | DL 2.9 ± 1.21 |
| Muratore, 2015 | Prospective | 26 | 66 (range, 38-84) | 16:10 | 26 (range, 17-38) | 19/26 | 4.4 (range, 3-6) |
| Prochazka, 2015 | Prospective | 17 | 68 (range, 49-81) | 11:6 | 28 (range, 22-32) | 12/17 | AV 6 (range, 3-8) |
- Citation: Wolthuis AM, Bislenghi G, Overstraeten ABV, D’Hoore A. Transanal total mesorectal excision: Towards standardization of technique. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(44): 12686-12695
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i44/12686.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i44.12686