Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2015; 21(41): 11700-11708
Published online Nov 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i41.11700
Published online Nov 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i41.11700
Ref. | TME quality | Positive CRM | Distal margins | LN |
Marks et al[25] | NA | 6.3% | 1.9 cm | 11.4 |
Tuech et al[22] | 84% intact and 16% nearly intact | 5.4% | 1 cm | 12 |
Han et al[39] | NA | 0% | 2.43 | 12.9 |
Rouanet et al[21] | 100% good | 13.3% | 0.9 cm | 13 |
Muratore et al[20] | 88.5% complete | 0% | 1.9 cm | 10 |
Atallah et al[17] | 89.5% complete or nearly complete | 5% | 5% positive | 22.5 |
Buchs et al[44] | 94.1% intact and 5.9% nearly intact | 5.9% | 2.14 cm | 23.2 |
De Lacy et al[18] | 100% satisfactory | 0% | 2.6 cm | 15.9 |
Chouillard et al[29] | 100% intact | 0% | 3.6 cm | 21 |
Wolthuis et al[43] | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Knol et al[40] | 90% intact | 0% | 1.94 cm | 10.5 |
Velthuis et al[42] | 100% intact | 0% | 0 positive | 12 |
Sylla et al[41] | 100% intact | 0% | 0 positive | 33 |
- Citation: Buchs NC, Nicholson GA, Ris F, Mortensen NJ, Hompes R. Transanal total mesorectal excision: A valid option for rectal cancer? World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(41): 11700-11708
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i41/11700.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i41.11700