Diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in gallbladder cancer: A meta-analysis

doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11481

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 21, Issue 40

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (6736)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

364

WORD

430

HTML

3083

Figures (1-3)

206

Tables (1-3)

211

Sum=4294

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

946

Download

1496

Sum=2442

Oct 28, 2015 (publication date) through Jul 31, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (32)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2015; 21(40): 11481-11488
Published online Oct 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11481

Table 2 Technical characteristics of the studies included in the systematic review

Ref.	Year	Device	¹⁸F-FDG mean injected dose (MBq)	Time between ¹⁸F-FDG injection and image acquisition (min)	Image analysis	Other imaging methods performed
Koh et al[4]	2003	PET	185	60	Visual	CT
Anderson et al[5]	2004	PET	370	60	Visual	CT, MRI
Rodríguez-Fernández et al[6]	2004	PET	370	45-60	Visual and semiquantitative	US, CT
Wakabayashi et al[7]	2005	PET	185	60	Visual	CT
Nishiyama et al[8]	2006	PET	185-370	40-55	Visual and semiquantitative	US, CT
Oe et al[9]	2006	PET	3/kg	62-146	Visual and semiquantitative	US, CT, MRI
Petrowsky et al[10]	2006	PET/CT	370	45	Visual and semiquantitative	CT
Shukla et al[11]	2008	PET/CT	370	60	Visual	CT
Corvera et al[12]	2008	PET	370-555	NR	Visual and semiquantitative	CT, MRI
Furukawa et al[13]	2008	PET	200-250	60	Visual	CT
Furukawa et al[14]	2009	PET	200-250	60	Visual and Semiquantitative	CT, MRI, PTC
Butte et al[15]	2009	PET/CT	370	60	Visual and semiquantitative	NR
Lee et al[16]	2010	PET/CT	370-555	60	Visual and semiquantitative	CT
Zhu et al[17]	2010	PET or PET/TC	370-555	45	Visual and Semiquantitative	CT
Lee et al[18]	2012	PET/CT	370	45-60	Visual	NR
Kumar et al[19]	2012	PET/CT	5.5/kg	60	Visual and semiquantitative	NR
Yamada et al[20]	2012	PET	4.5/kg	60	Visual and semiquantitative	NR
Albazaz et al[2]	2013	PET/CT	400	60	Visual and semiquantitative	CT, MRI
Lee et al[21]	2013	PET/CT	370-555	60	Visual and semiquantitative	CT, MRCP, ERCP, EUS
Onal et al[22]	2013	PET/CT	370-555	60	Visual and Semiquantitative	MRI, CT
Ramos-Font et al[1]	2014	PET/CT	370	60	Visual and semiquantitative	NR

¹⁸F-FDG: Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose; PET: Positron emission tomography; CT: Computed tomography; MR: Magnetic resonance; US: Ultrasonography; CR: Chest radiography; PTC: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography; NR: Not reported; CT: Computed tomography; ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Citation: Annunziata S, Pizzuto DA, Caldarella C, Galiandro F, Sadeghi R, Treglia G. Diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in gallbladder cancer: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(40): 11481-11488
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i40/11481.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11481