Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2015; 21(40): 11469-11480
Published online Oct 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11469
Published online Oct 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11469
Ref. | Number of participants | Population | Histology index used | Histology indexcut off | Faecal marker measured | Faecal marker cut off | Outcome measures | Correlation | |||||
CD | UC | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | r value | P value | ||||||
Crohn’s disease studies | |||||||||||||
Kaiser et al[42] | 32 | 27 | Adults | Unique score | 0 | S100A12 | - | - | - | - | 0.44 | < 0.01 | |
32 | S100A12 | 0.8 | 81 | 100 | - | - | 0.451 | 0.01 | |||||
27 | S100A12 | 0.8 | 91 | 100 | - | - | 0.44 | < 0.025 |
- Citation: Boon GJ, Day AS, Mulder CJ, Gearry RB. Are faecal markers good indicators of mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease? World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(40): 11469-11480
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i40/11469.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11469