Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2015; 21(40): 11469-11480
Published online Oct 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11469
Table 3 Studies investigating the correlation between other faecal marker concentrations and endoscopic activity in subjects with inflammatory bowel diseases
Ref.Number of participants
PopulationEndoscopic index usedEndoscopic indexcut offFaecal marker measuredFaecal marker cut offOutcome measures
Correlation
CDUCSensitivitySpecificityPPVNPVr valueP value
Nancey et al[45]78AdultsSES-CD ≤ 2Neopterin200 pmol/g747373740.47< 0.001
150 pmol/g80656878
55AdultsRachmilewitz ≤ 2Neopterin200 pmol/g74100100730.72< 0.001
150 pmol/g8410010078
Nakarai et al[39]152MixedMayo0Faecal Hb< 100 ng/mL927137970.5409< 0.0001
Faecal Hb< 60 ng/mL94744098
Mayo ≤ 1Faecal Hb< 100 ng/mL60878564
Faecal Hb< 60 ng/mL58908864
Langhorst et al[23]43AdultsSES-CDPMN-e< 0.062 μg/mL81.8709054.80.32< 0.05
42AdultsMayoPMN-e< 0.062 μg/mL70.466.779.255.60.36< 0.05
Silberer et al[32]2118AdultsStangePMN-e0.12479.595---< 0.0001
Lysozyme1.347.595---< 0.0001
α1-AT1582095----
Faecal Hb1.861.595----
Hb-Hp0.864.195----
Moran et al[40]721MixedFarmerα1-AT ≤ 0.58 mg/g----0.830.001
Cellier et al[41]95AdultsCDEISα1-AT----0.260.001