Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2015; 21(4): 1158-1166
Published online Jan 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i4.1158
Table 3 Comparison between patients with and without significant liver fibrosis (> 7 kPa)
VariablesPatients without significant fibrosis [n = 148 (93.1%), LS value7 kPa]Patients with significant fibrosis [n = 11 (6.9%), LS value > 7 kPa]P value
Age, yr55.5 ± 10.463.2 ± 11.5NS
Male gender80 (54.1)7 (63.6)NS
Body mass index, kg/m224.1 ± 3.027.5 ± 3.00.001
Diabetes mellitus17 (11.5)2 (18.2)NS
Hypertension38 (25.7)2 (18.2)NS
Daily alcohol intake, mg16.2 ± 31.711.0 ± 16.4NS
Alanine aminotransferase, IU/L22.2 ± 11.432.3 ± 17.10.024
Platelet count, 109/L235.6 ± 55.5234.2 ± 92.0NS
Fasting plasma glucose, mg/dL99.7 ± 24.3106.1 ± 24.9NS
HOMA-IR1.7 ± 1.22.9 ± 2.00.034
HbA1c, %6.0 ± 0.76.2 ± 0.6NS
Presence of fatty liver on Sonography, n53 (35.8%)9 (81.8%)0.004
Intimal media thickness, mm0.7 ± 0.21.4 ± 2.10.011
Presence of carotid plaque31 (20.9)3 (27.3)NS
Calcified carotid plaque, n0.4 ± 1.01.5 ± 1.80.019
Visceral fat area, cm2107.2 ± 47.7171.5 ± 93.00.002
Controlled attenuation parameter, dB/m246.4 ± 43.8266.7 ± 45.6NS