Topic Highlight
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2015; 21(38): 10760-10775
Published online Oct 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i38.10760
Table 2 Sustained virological response among recent clinical trials of new treatment regimens for hepatitis C virus including patients with cirrhosis
Ref.TrialPopulationDrugOverall SVR12SVR12 in cirrhosis
Jacobson et al[143], 2014FusionG2, G3 experiencedSOF/RBV 12 vs 16 wkG2 86% vs 94%G2 60% vs 78%
34% cirrhoticG3 62% vs 30%G3 19% vs 61%
Lawitz et al[33], 2015FissionG2, G3 naïveSOF/RBV 12 wk vs Peg-IFN/RBV 24 wkG2 97% vs 78%G2 92% vs 62%
20% cirrhosisG3 56% vs 63%G3 30% vs 34%
Jacobson et al[143], 2014PositronG2, G3 naïve and experienced IFN ineligibleSOF/RBVG2 93%, G3 61%G2 92%, G3 21%
Zeuzem et al[144], 2014ValenceG3 extended 24 wk 21% cirrhosisSOF/RBVG2 94%, G3 91%G2 82%, G3 68%
Lawitz et al[42], 2015Lonestar-2G 2 and 3SOF/RBV/Peg-IFNG2 96%, G3 83%G2 93%, G3 83%
Bourliere et al[43], 2015SiriusG1 with compensated cirrhosis, NR previous treatmentSOF/LDV 24 wk vs SOF/LDV/RBV 12 wkN/A97% vs 96%
Lawitz et al[36], 2014CosmosG1 NR, 52% F3-F4SOF/SMV ± RBV 12 or 24 wk92%94%
Gane et al[114], 2014Electron IIG1 naïve, experienced and decompensated, G3 naïve, 15% cirrhosisLDV/RBV 12 wkG1 100%, G3 64%G1 65%