Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2015; 21(37): 10675-10682
Published online Oct 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10675
Published online Oct 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10675
Figure 2 Recovery of the shoulder function.
The shoulder recovery condition had a statistically significant difference between the two groups on POM 1 (3D vs 2D, POM 1:87.40 ± 3.14 vs 83.50 ± 4.05, P = 0.03). CMS: Constant-Murley scale; pre-op: Pre-operation; POD: Postoperative day; POM: Postoperative month; 3D: Three-dimensional; 2D: Two-dimensional.
-
Citation: Li Z, Li JP, Qin X, Xu BB, Han YD, Liu SD, Zhu WZ, Peng MZ, Lin Q. Three-dimensional
vs two-dimensional video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(37): 10675-10682 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i37/10675.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10675