Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2015; 21(37): 10675-10682
Published online Oct 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10675
Published online Oct 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10675
3D-VATE (%)(n = 45) | 2D-VATE (%)(n = 48) | P value | |
Smoking1 | 7 (15.6) | 9 (18.8) | 0.91 |
FEV1 (L) | 2.73 ± 0.36 | 2.77 ± 0.36 | 0.65 |
FEV1% | 85.1 ± 5.8 | 86.6 ± 6.5 | 0.26 |
Dlco% | 91.9 ± 3.88 | 92.8 ± 3.78 | 0.23 |
PaO2 (mmHg) | 407.8 ± 19.7 | 402.1 ± 18.7 | 0.16 |
BMI | 22.5 ± 2.0 | 22.2 ± 2.0 | 0.44 |
ASA class | 2.58 ± 0.54 | 2.58 ± 0.53 | 0.96 |
-
Citation: Li Z, Li JP, Qin X, Xu BB, Han YD, Liu SD, Zhu WZ, Peng MZ, Lin Q. Three-dimensional
vs two-dimensional video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(37): 10675-10682 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i37/10675.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10675