Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2015; 21(37): 10675-10682
Published online Oct 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10675
Published online Oct 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10675
3D-VATE (%)n = 45 | 2D-VATE (%)n = 48 | P value | |
Thoracoscopic operating time1 (min) | 68 ± 13.79 | 83 ± 13 | < 0.01 |
Operating time2 (min) | 138 ± 14 | 167 ± 20 | < 0.01 |
Bleeding (mL) | 68.2 ± 10.7 | 89.8 ± 10.4 | < 0.01 |
Chest drains (mL) | 306.6 ± 56.2 | 366.4 ± 62.6 | < 0.01 |
Chest tube duration (d) | 2.67 ± 1.01 | 3.75 ± 1.15 | < 0.01 |
Length of stay (d) | 9.07 ± 2.00 | 10.85 ± 3.40 | 0.003 |
Expenses (RMB) | 74968.4 ± 9637.8 | 86211.1 ± 8519.7 | < 0.01 |
-
Citation: Li Z, Li JP, Qin X, Xu BB, Han YD, Liu SD, Zhu WZ, Peng MZ, Lin Q. Three-dimensional
vs two-dimensional video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(37): 10675-10682 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i37/10675.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10675