Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2015; 21(36): 10358-10366
Published online Sep 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10358
Published online Sep 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10358
Table 1 Summary of biological and biochemical differences between 72Arg and 72Pro TP53 isoforms
Property | 72Arg vs72Pro TP53 |
Electrophoretic mobility | 72Arg migrates slightly faster on SDS[16,19,20] |
Subcellular localization | 72Arg is cytoplasmic/mitochondrial possibly through interaction with CD2AP/Cin85 adaptor protein family[21] or with mitochondrial (mt) polymerase gamma, which may also promote mtDNA repair[22,23] 72Pro is predominantly nuclear[21,24] |
Apoptosis induction | 72Arg is a stronger apoptosis inducer[24], with faster kinetics of cell death[16] possibly through more efficient inhibition of 72Pro by iASPP[25] or preferential localization of 72Arg to mitochondria and induction of apoptosis through a transcriptionally independent pathway[24] |
Suppression of transformed cell growth | 72Arg is two times more active in suppressing colony formation[16] |
Susceptibility to HPV E6 degradation | 72Arg is more susceptible to degradation[26,27] |
Transcription activation | 72Arg associates and inactivates p73 more efficiently[20], thus inhibiting apoptosis72Pro is a stronger inducer of transcription and it has more affinity to TAFII32 and TAFII70[16] |
Leukemia inhibitory factor transactivation | 72Arg is more active towards this function[28,29], which may be advantageous in cold climates due to increased fertility[18] |
- Citation: Volodko N, Salla M, Eksteen B, Fedorak RN, Huynh HQ, Baksh S. TP53 codon 72 Arg/Arg polymorphism is associated with a higher risk for inflammatory bowel disease development. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(36): 10358-10366
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i36/10358.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10358