Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2015; 21(36): 10327-10335
Published online Sep 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10327
Published online Sep 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10327
Stage | Potential role of TACE |
BCLC 0 | TACE may be considered a viable alternative treatment to RFA for treating single HCCs measuring 2 cm or smaller when RFA is not feasible |
BCLC A | 1: The combination of TACE and RFA is safe and provides better local tumor control than RFA alone in the treatment of medium sized HCC (3-5 cm) |
2: For a large solitary HCC (> 5 cm), HR provides better overall survival than HCC, but TACE could be considered as an alternative initial treatment when HR is not feasible | |
3: TACE can be used to downstage the tumor within the Milan criteria before LT or serve as a bridge to LT | |
BCLC B | 1: TACE is the standard of care for this stratum of patients |
2: Combination with other therapies such as RFA and sorafenib may provide better patient survival or local tumor control | |
BCLC C | 1: Repeated TACE showed significant survival benefits in patients with advanced HCC compared with supportive care |
2: Sorafenib plus TACE has a demonstrable effect in delaying tumor progression | |
3: Combination with radiotherapy has resulted in better survival in patients with HCC and PVT |
- Citation: Han K, Kim JH. Transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: Barcelona clinic liver cancer staging system. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(36): 10327-10335
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i36/10327.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10327