Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2015; 21(35): 10184-10191
Published online Sep 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i35.10184
Published online Sep 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i35.10184
Table 3 Receiver operating curve analysis of measured parameters for identifying the presence and Child-Pugh class of cirrhosis, and the presence of esophageal varices
Parameter | Cutoff values | Differentiations | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity |
PLT (109/L) | 217 | Normal liver vs cirrhosis | 0.903 | 97.5% | 86.8% |
140 | Child-Pugh class A vs B | 0.661 | 66.0% | 64.2% | |
114 | Child-Pugh class A vs C | 0.859 | 80.9% | 82.5% | |
96.5 | Child-Pugh class B vs C | 0.703 | 61.1% | 79.4% | |
99.5 | No varices vs varices | 0.678 | 61.5% | 60.2% | |
SV/PLT | 0.83 | Normal liver vs cirrhosis | 0.952 | 91.2% | 97.5% |
2.99 | Child-Pugh class A vs B | 0.663 | 58.9% | 63.8% | |
5.19 | Child-Pugh class A vs C | 0.873 | 69.8% | 95.7% | |
5.40 | Child-Pugh class B vs C | 0.722 | 69.8% | 62.1% | |
4.13 | No varices vs varices | 0.782 | 72.7% | 68.4% | |
SI/PLT | 2 | Normal liver vs cirrhosis | 0.967 | 93.7% | 97.5% |
6.08 | Child-Pugh class A vs B | 0.692 | 65.3% | 61.7% | |
12.55 | Child-Pugh class A vs C | 0.902 | 76.2% | 97.9% | |
13.01 | Child-Pugh class B vs C | 0.724 | 74.6% | 63.2% | |
11.08 | No varices vs varices | 0.773 | 72.7% | 70.1% | |
RVPS | 883.90 | Normal liver vs cirrhosis | 0.973 | 97.5% | 92.7% |
330.98 | Child-Pugh class A vs B | 0.740 | 78.7% | 62.1% | |
175.72 | Child-Pugh class A vs C | 0.976 | 93.6% | 92.1% | |
129.36 | Child-Pugh class B vs C | 0.853 | 72.6% | 81.0% | |
226.46 | No varices vs varices | 0.758 | 64.1% | 79.5% |
- Citation: Chen XL, Chen TW, Zhang XM, Li ZL, Zeng NL, Zhou P, Li H, Ren J, Xu GH, Hu JN. Platelet count combined with right liver volume and spleen volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging for identifying cirrhosis and esophageal varices. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(35): 10184-10191
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i35/10184.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i35.10184