Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2015; 21(34): 9999-10007
Published online Sep 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i34.9999
Published online Sep 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i34.9999
Table 2 Comparison of perioperative outcomes between the antrum-preserving double-tract reconstruction group and the Roux-en-Y reconstruction group
Clinical feature | ADTR (n = 18) | RY (n = 37) | P value |
Postoperative hospital stay (d) | 12.88 ± 5.81 | 14.08 ± 5.85 | 0.495 |
Operating time (min) | 282.22 ± 77.93 | 274.86 ± 63.23 | 0.709 |
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) | 362.77 ± 294.15 | 270.81 ± 148.22 | 0.601 |
First flatus time (d) | 2.94 ± 0.83 | 3.97 ± 1.11 | 0.002 |
Time to resume liquid diet (d) | 4.47 ± 1.28 | 6.11 ± 1.82 | 0.001 |
-
Citation: Xiao JW, Liu ZL, Ye PC, Luo YJ, Fu ZM, Zou Q, Wei SJ. Clinical comparison of antrum-preserving double tract reconstruction
vs roux-en-Y reconstruction after gastrectomy for Siewert types II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(34): 9999-10007 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i34/9999.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i34.9999