Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2015; 21(33): 9693-9706
Published online Sep 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i33.9693
Published online Sep 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i33.9693
Table 2 Different screening modalities
| Modality | Sensitivity (95%CI) | Specificity (95%CI) | PPV (95%CI) | NPV (95%CI) | Accuracy (95%CI) |
| WL | 47.3% | 97.4% | 79.4% | 89.8% | 88.7% |
| NBI | 84.2% | 95.6% | 80.0% | 96.6% | 93.6% |
| Lugol1 | 93.0% | 90.7% | 67.9% | 98.4% | 91.1% |
| NBI or Lugol | 94.7% | 90.4% | 67.5% | 98.8% | 91.1% |
| NBI or Lugol | 82.6% | 95.9% | 81.0% | 93.6% | 93.6% |
- Citation: Ro TH, Mathew MA, Misra S. Value of screening endoscopy in evaluation of esophageal, gastric and colon cancers. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(33): 9693-9706
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i33/9693.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i33.9693