Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2015; 21(32): 9598-9606
Published online Aug 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i32.9598
Published online Aug 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i32.9598
With significant improvement1 | Without improvement | P-value | |
n | 9 | 18 | |
Male gender, n (%) | 6 (66.7) | 13 (72.2) | 0.7657 |
Age (mean ± SD), yr | 42.1 ± 11.6 | 42.9 ± 9.8 | 0.8557 |
log10 HBV DNA (mean ± SD), IU/mL | 7.3 ± 1.0 | 5.9 ± 1.5 | 0.0175 |
ALT (mean ± SD), U/L | 140 ± 72 | 99 ± 121 | 0.0270 |
HBeAg positivity, n (%) | 7 (77.8) | 10 (55.6) | 0.2597 |
Median grade (range) | 11(3-14) | 9 (0-13) | 0.2778 |
Median stage (range) | 5 (3-6) | 3.5 (2-5) | 0.2717 |
Duration of treatment (mean ± SD), mo | 44 ± 11 | 41 ± 18 | 0.3956 |
-
Citation: Wang JL, Du XF, Chen SL, Yu YQ, Wang J, Hu XQ, Shao LY, Chen JZ, Weng XH, Zhang WH. Histological outcome for chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir
vs lamivudine-based therapy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(32): 9598-9606 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i32/9598.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i32.9598