Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2015; 21(32): 9598-9606
Published online Aug 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i32.9598
Published online Aug 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i32.9598
With improvement in fibrosis | Without improvement in fibrosis | P-value | |
n | 24 | 18 | |
Male gender, n (%) | 17 (70.83) | 13 (72.22) | 0.9215 |
Age (mean ± SD), yr | 43.8 ± 9.9 | 42.9 ± 9.8 | 0.7596 |
log10 HBV DNA (mean ± SD), IU/mL | 6.7 ± 1.2 | 5.9 ± 1.5 | 0.0602 |
ALT (mean ± SD), U/L | 102 ± 82 | 99 ± 121 | 0.6473 |
HBeAg positivity, n (%) | 17 (70.83) | 10 (55.56) | 0.3065 |
Median grade (range) | 10 (3-16) | 9 (0-13) | 0.1713 |
Median stage (range) | 5 (3-6) | 3.5 (2-5) | 0.0230 |
Treated with ETV, n (%) | 13 (54.17) | 6 (33.33) | 0.1795 |
Treatment duration ≥ 24 mo, n (%) | 24 (100) | 13 (72.22) | 0.0101 |
-
Citation: Wang JL, Du XF, Chen SL, Yu YQ, Wang J, Hu XQ, Shao LY, Chen JZ, Weng XH, Zhang WH. Histological outcome for chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir
vs lamivudine-based therapy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(32): 9598-9606 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i32/9598.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i32.9598