Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2015; 21(30): 9189-9208
Published online Aug 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9189
Published online Aug 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9189
Ref. | Drug/supplements | Study design | Jadad score | n | Treatment (intervention) | Outcome (results) | Adverse effects/events | Other comments | ||
Case | Control | Primary | Other | |||||||
Abbasinazari et al[40], 2011 | Allopurinol | Randomized double blind clinical trial | 3 | 74 | 29 patients; | 45 patients; no medication | Rate of PEP1(11.5% vs 12.5%) | Serum amylase activity1 | - | - |
Martinez-Torres et al[41], 2009 | Allopurinol | Randomized; double-blind; placebo-controlled | 5 | 170 | 85 patients; 300 mg oral allopurinol 15 h and 3 h before ERCP | 85 patients; placebo | Rate of PEP ↓ (2.3% vs 9.4%) | Serum amylase activity ↓ | - | 21.7% absolute benefit in patients with high-risk procedures favoring allopurinol, no difference in low-risk procedures |
Kapetanos et al[42], 2009 | Pentoxifylline | Randomized; | 2 | 590 | 205 patients; 400 mg oral Pentoxifylline, 40 h, 32 h, 24 h, 16 h and 8 h before ERCP (total dose 2 g) | 205 patients; no medication | Rate of PEP1(7.3% vs 2.9%) | TNF-α1IL-61 | - | - |
Octreotide | 180 patients; 0.5 mg subcutaneous octreotide, 64 h, 56 h, 48 h, 40 h, 32 h, 24 h, 16 h and 8 h before ERCP (total dose 4 mg) | 205 patients; no medication | Rate of PEP1(5% vs 2.9%) | TNF-α↓IL-61 | ||||||
Romagnuolo et al[43], 2008 | Allopurinol | Randomized; double blind; placebo- controlled | 4 | 586 | 293 patients; 300 mg oral allopurinol 60 min before ERCP | 293 patients; placebo | Rate of PEP1(5.5% vs 4.1%) | Disease-related adverse events1Procedure-related complications1Hospitalization1 | - | In the non–high-risk group (n = 520), the crude PEP rates were 5.4% for allopurinol and 1.5% for placebo (P = 0.017), favoring placebo, indicating harm associated with allopurinol, whereas in the high-risk group (n = 66), the PEP rates were 6.3% for allopurinol and 23.5% for placebo (P = 0.050), favoring allopurinol |
Kapetanos et al[44], 2007 | Pentoxifylline | Randomized; | 2 | 320 | 158 patients; 400 mg oral pentoxifylline, 40 h, 32 h, 24 h, 16 h and 8 h before ERCP (total dose 2 g) | 162 patients; no medication | Rate of PEP1(5.6% vs 3%) | Hemorrhage1Serum amylase activity1 | Nausea and vomiting in 10% of the patients who received the drug | - |
Milewski et al[45], 2006 | N-acetylcysteine | Randomized; placebo-controlled | 2 | 106 | 55 patients; 600 mg oral N-acetylcysteine 24 h and 12 h before ERCP and 1200 mg IV for 2 d after the ERCP | 51 patients; isotonic IV saline b.d for 2 d after the ERCP | Rate of PEP1(7.3% vs 11.8%) | Urine amylase activity1Serum amylase activity1 | - | - |
Katsinelos et al[46], 2005 | Allopurinol | Randomized; double blind; placebo-controlled | 4 | 250 | 125 patients; 600 mg oral allopurinol 15 and 3 h before ERCP | 118 patients; placebo | Rate of PEP ↓(3.2% vs 17.8%) | Hospitalization ↓Severity of Pancreatitis ↓ | - | - |
Katsinelos et al[47], 2005 | N-acetylcysteine | Randomized; double-blind; placebo-controlled | 3 | 256 | 124 patients; 70 mg/kg 2 h before and 35 mg/kg at 4 h intervals for a total of 24 h after the procedure | 125 patients; placebo (normal saline solution) | Rate of PEP1Hospitalization1 | - | Nausea Skin rash Diarrhea Vomiting | 2 patients with suspected SOD |
Mosler et al[48], 2005 | Allopurinol | Randomized; double blind; placebo- controlled | 4 | 701 | 355 patients; 600 mg 4 h and 300 mg 1 h oral allopurinol before ERCP | 346 patients; placebo | Rate of PEP1(13.0% vs 12.1%) | Severity of pancreatitis1 | - | 4% absolute benefit in high-risk patients; 4% absolute harm in average risk |
Lavy et al[49], 2004 | Natural β-carotene | Randomized; double-blind; placebo-controlled | 5 | 321 | 141 patients; 2 g oral β-carotene 12 h before ERCP | 180 patients; placebo | Rate of PEP1(10% vs 9.4%) | Severe pancreatitis ↓ | - | - |
Budzyńska et al[50], 2001 | Allopurinol | Randomized; placebo-controlled | 3 | 300 | 99 patients; 200 mg oral Allopurinol 15 h and 3 h before ERCP | 101 patients; placebo | Rate of PEP1(12.1% vs 7.9%) | Severity of pancreatitis1 | - | 3-arm study, with third arm (n = 100) given prednisone |
- Citation: Gooshe M, Abdolghaffari AH, Nikfar S, Mahdaviani P, Abdollahi M. Antioxidant therapy in acute, chronic and post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(30): 9189-9208
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i30/9189.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9189