Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2015; 21(30): 9182-9188
Published online Aug 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9182
Published online Aug 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9182
Table 2 Results of selective bile duct cannulation n (%)
| 0.025-inch group (n = 109) | 0.035-inch group (n = 160) | P value | |
| Success rate of selective bile duct cannulation with WGC | 88 (80.7) | 138 (86.3) | 0.2261 |
| Pancreatic duct GW | 15 (13.8) | 21 (13.1) | 0.8801 |
| Success rate of selective bile duct cannulation with pancreatic duct GW | 7 (46.7) | 11 (52.4) | 0.8841 |
| Precutting | 9 (8.3) | 11 (6.9) | 0.6721 |
| Success rate of selective bile duct cannulation with precutting | 6 (66.7) | 7 (63.6) | 0.8931 |
| Final success rate of selective bile duct cannulation | 101 (92.7) | 156 (97.5) | 0.1131 |
- Citation: Kitamura K, Yamamiya A, Ishii Y, Sato Y, Iwata T, Nomoto T, Ikegami A, Yoshida H. 0.025-inch vs 0.035-inch guide wires for wire-guided cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(30): 9182-9188
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i30/9182.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9182