Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2015; 21(3): 888-896
Published online Jan 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.888
Published online Jan 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.888
Control group | Diversion group | P value | |
Body weight (kg) | 17.4 ± 3.3 | 18.1 ± 3.5 | 0.97 |
Left tri-lobes (g) | 351.2 ± 14.9 | 365.5 ± 15.8 | 0.81 |
ETL (g) | 442.7 ± 18.4 | 457.0 ± 19.7 | 0.86 |
WRL (g) | 390.7 ± 19.4 | 401.8 ± 20.4 | 0.79 |
ERL (g) | 55.7 ± 3.8 | 60.8 ± 4.1 | 0.91 |
Proportion of ERL (%) | 12.8 ± 2.3 | 13.2 ± 3.5 | 0.87 |
OT (min) | 115 ± 23 | 121 ± 28 | 0.45 |
Blood loss (mL) | 35.7 ± 13.8 | 45.1 ± 16.1 | 0.73 |
- Citation: Wang DD, Xu Y, Zhu ZM, Tan XL, Tu YL, Han MM, Tan JW. Should temporary extracorporeal continuous portal diversion replace meso/porta-caval shunts in “small-for-size” syndrome in porcine hepatectomy? World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(3): 888-896
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i3/888.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.888