Endoscopic ultrasonography guided drainage: Summary of consortium meeting, May 21, 2012, San Diego, California

doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.726

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 21, Issue 3

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (10573)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-7) series.

Item

Count

PDF

746

WORD

410

HTML

4389

Figures (1-1)

281

Tables (1-7)

369

Sum=6195

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1046

Download

1289

Sum=2335

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

1106

Download

937

Sum=2043

Jan 21, 2015 (publication date) through Feb 7, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (18)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Review

World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2015; 21(3): 726-741
Published online Jan 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.726

Table 5 Outcomes of biliary drainage in endosonographic cholangiopancreatography series including surgically altered anatomy patients n (%)

Ref.	n	Patients with SAA	Overall technical success	Type of ESCP drainage				Complications
				Transpapillary		Transmural
				RV	AG	HG	CD
Will et al[31] (2007)	8	7 (87)	7 (87)	1	-	6	-	2 (25)
Bories et al[16] (2007)	11	4 (36)	10 (91)	-	-	10	-	4 (36)
Horaguchi et al[14] (2009)	16	4 (25)	16 (100)	-	-	8	8	2 (12)
Maranki et al[34] (2009)	49	7 (14)	41 (84)	20¹	14¹	3	4	8 (16)
Shah et al[106] (2012)	68	19 (28)	58 (85)	39²	10²	8	1	6 (9)
Iwashita et al[118] (2012)	40	9 (40)	29 (73)	29	-	-	-	5 (13)
Park et al[55] (2013)	45	14 (31)	41 (95)	16	9	14	2	5 (11)
Total	237	64 (27)	202 (85)	105	33	49	15	32 (13)
Total	237	64 (27)	202 (85)	138 (68)		64 (32)		32 (13)

¹Not specified in the original report, data provided by the author;

²Not specified in the original report. Data estimated from prior detailed series[48]. SAA: Surgically altered anatomy; ESCP: Endosonographic cholangiopancreatography; RV: Rendezvous; AG: Antegrade; HG: Hepatico-gastrostomy; CD: Choledochoduodenostomy.

Citation: Kahaleh M, Artifon EL, Perez-Miranda M, Gaidhane M, Rondon C, Itoi T, Giovannini M. Endoscopic ultrasonography guided drainage: Summary of consortium meeting, May 21, 2012, San Diego, California. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(3): 726-741
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i3/726.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.726