Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2015; 21(29): 8903-8911
Published online Aug 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i29.8903
Published online Aug 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i29.8903
Table 4 Manchester scar scale: 5 (best) to 18 (worse)
| Category | Visual analog scale descriptor | Poor |
| Color | Perfect | 1 |
| Slight mismatch | 2 | |
| Obvious mismatch | 3 | |
| Gross mismatch | 4 | |
| Matte vs shiny | Matte | 1 |
| Shiny | 2 | |
| Contour | Flush with surrounding skin | 1 |
| Slightly proud/indented | 2 | |
| Hypertrophic | 3 | |
| Keloid | 4 | |
| Distortion | None | 1 |
| Mild | 2 | |
| Moderate | 3 | |
| Severe | 4 | |
| Texture | Normal | 1 |
| Just palpable | 2 | |
| Firm | 3 | |
| Hard | 4 |
- Citation: Aubdoollah TH, Li K, Zhang X, Li S, Yang L, Lei HY, Dolo PR, Xiang XC, Cao GQ, Wang GB, Tang ST. Clinical outcomes and ergonomics analysis of three laparoscopic techniques for Hirschsprung's disease. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(29): 8903-8911
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i29/8903.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i29.8903