Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2015; 21(29): 8868-8877
Published online Aug 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i29.8868
Table 3 Included studies of circulating levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and colorectal adenoma
First author, yearCountry (sex)Study designstudy datesEndpointType of endoscopy25(OH)D, mean or medianNo. of cases/controls25(OH)D levels in the highest vs lowest categoriesOR (95%Cl)
Platz, 2000United States (W)Prospective study1989-1996First adenomaSigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy26.4 in cases and 26.8 ng/mL in controls, mean326/32638.0 ng/mL vs 16.3 ng/mL, median1.00 (ref), 0.64, 0.58, 1.04 (0.66-1.66)
Levine, 2001United States (M, W)Case-control study1991-1993First adenomaSigmoidoscopy25.6 in cases and 26.9 ng/mL in controls, mean473/50634.3-115 ng/mL vs 1-15.2 ng/mL, range1.00 (ref), 0.99, 0.86, 0.74 (0.51-1.09)
Peters, 2001United States (M, W)Case-control study1994-1996First (61%) or recurrent adenomaColonoscopy (86.2%) or sigmoidoscopy24.7 in cases and 26.5 ng/mL in controls, median236/21833.7-67.2 ng/mL vs 5.3-19.4 ng/mL, range1.0(ref), 0.40, 0.67, 0.47, 0.43(0.23-0.81)
Grau, 2003United States (M, W)Prospective study1992-1996Recurrent adenomaColonoscopy29.1 ng/mL, median376/422-0.99 (0.91-1.07) OR for serum vitD levels per 12 (1SD) units increase
Peters, 2004United States (M, W)Prospective study1993-1999First advanced adenomaSigmoidoscopy27.0 in cases and 28.3 ng/mL in controls, mean394/397-0.87 (0.75-1.01) OR for serum vitD levels per 10 units increase.
Miller, 2007United States (M, W)Cross-sectional study1998-2000First adenomaColonoscopy27.5 in cases and 31.4 ng/mL in controls, mean111/238> 33.8 ng/mL vs < 20.8 ng/mL, range1.00 (ref), 0.74, 0.51 (0.27-0.98)
Takahashi, 2010Japan (M)Case-control study1997-2004First adenomaColonoscopy26.2 in cases and 26.1 ng/mL in controls, mean656/648≥ 30 ng/mL vs < 22 ng/ml, range1.00 (ref), 1.21, 1.21, 1.25 (0.85-1.84)
Fedirko, 2010United States (M, W)Pooled case-control study1991-2002First adenomaColonoscopy24.5 in cases and 25.5 ng/mL in controls, mean616/7701.00 (ref), 0.77, 0.85, 0.59 (0.41-0.84)
Adams, 2011United States (M, W)Cross-sectional study1998- 2003Fitst or recurrent adenomaColonoscopy23.1 in cases and 24.9 ng/mL in controls, mean149/ 225> 28.9 ng/mL vs ≤ 20.5 ng/ml, range1.00 (ref), 0.97, 0.71 (0.38-1.30)
Ashktorab, 2011United States (M, W)Case-control studyColonoscopy41.2 in cases and 41.4 ng/mL in controls, mean93/187> 57.7 ng/mL vs < 29.5 ng/mL, range1.00 (ref), 1.4, 1.9, 0.6 (0.3-1.4)
Hong, 2012Korea (M, W)Case-control study2009-2010First adenomaColonoscopy20.0 in cases and 25.0 ng/mL in controls, mean143/ 143≥ 23.9 ng/mL vs < 14.3 ng/mL, range1.00 (ref), 0.87, 0.40, 0.38 (0.18-0.80)
Yamaji, 2012Japan (M,W)Cross-sectional study2004-2005First adenomaColonoscopy737/ 70332 ng/mL vs 16 ng/mL, median1.00 (ref), 0.86, 0.91, 1.03, 0.64 (0.45-0.92)
Jacobs, 2013United States (M, W)Prospective study1990-1999Recurrent adenomaColonoscopy942/ 1132> 30 ng/mL vs < 20 ng/mL, range1.00 (ref), 0.91, 0.95 (0.73-1.24)
Aigner, 2014Austria (W)Cross-sectional study2010-2013First adenomaColonoscopy22.8 ng/mL in women90/6290.976 (0.954-0.999) for 1 ng/mL increment
Choi, 2015 (our study)Korea (M, W)Case-control study2011-2012First or recurrent(5%) adenomaColonoscopy15.7 ng/mL in cases and 16.6 in controls112/11223.4 ng/mL vs 10.0 ng/mL, mean1.00 (ref), 0.72, 0.73, 0.49 (0.19-1.27)