Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: A meta-analysis

Table 1 Study characteristics and complication outcomes

Reference	Year	Evidence level	Technique	No. of repairs	Overall complications	Mesh infection	Surgical site infection	Obstruction	Other complications	Mortality	Follow-up months
Safadi	2004	4	KH	9	3	0	0	0	3	0	24
LeBlanc	2005	4	KH/SB	12	4	0	0	1	3	1	20
Berger	2007	4	SB	41	3	0	1	1	1	0	241
Mancini	2007	4	SB	25	5	1	1	0	3	1	191
McLemore	2007	4	KH/SB	19	11	0	2	1	8	0	20
Muysoms	2008	4	KH/SB	24	2	0	0	0	2	0	22
Berger	2008	4	Sandwich	47	4	0	0	0	4	0	20
Hansson	2008	4	KH	55	6	2	0	0	4	0	361
Craft	2008	4	KH/SB	21	8	2	1	1	4	0	14
Pastor	2009	4	KH/SB	12	4	0	2	0	2	0	14
Jani	2010	4	KH	9	2	0	0	0	2	0	13
Wara	2011	4	KH	72	21	0	4	0	17	2	361
Asif	2012	4	KH/SB	33	13	0	4	1	8	0	12
Mizrahi	2012	4	KH	29	6	0	1	1	4	1	28
Hansson	2013	4	SB	61	12	1	1	0	9	1	26
Weighted pooled % (95%CI)					24.9% (17.9%-32.7%)	1.7% (0.7%-3.1%)	3.8% (2.3%-5.7%)	1.7%(0.7%-3.0%)	16.6%(11.9%-22.1%)	1.8%(0.8%-3.2%)

¹Months in median instead of mean.