Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2015; 21(26): 8178-8183
Published online Jul 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.8178
Published online Jul 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.8178
Outcome measure | PPH group (n = 54) | Control group (n = 54) | χ2or t value | P value |
Operative time, min | 24.36 ± 5.16 | 44.27 ± 6.57 | 17.514 | < 0.001 |
Postoperative hospital stay, d | 2.1 ± 1.4 | 3.6 ± 2.3 | 4.094 | 0.001 |
Urinary retention, n (%) | 26 (48.15) | 20 (37.04) | 1.363 | 0.243 |
Perianal edema, n (%) | 12 (11.11) | 23 (42.60) | 5.115 | 0.024 |
Postoperative VAS score | ||||
At 24 h | 2.9 ± 0.9 | 8.3 ± 1.1 | 27.923 | < 0.001 |
At first defecation | 2.0 ± 0.5 | 6.5±0.8 | 35.055 | < 0.001 |
At one week | 1.7 ± 0.5 | 5.0 ± 0.7 | 28.205 | < 0.001 |
-
Citation: Lu M, Yang B, Liu Y, Liu Q, Wen H. Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids
vs traditional surgery for outlet obstructive constipation. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(26): 8178-8183 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i26/8178.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.8178