Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2015; 21(26): 8156-8162
Published online Jul 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.8156
Table 3 Summary of treatment regimen, local control, progression-free survival, overall survival and late toxicity in previous studies compared with the present study
Ref.No. of patientsSBRT dose (Gy/No. of fractions)Gemcitabine-based chemotherapyLC (%)PFS (mo)OS (mo)Toxicity (G2) (%)
Didolkar et al[17]8515-30 Gy/3Sequential91.7-18.6 from diagnosis 8.6 from SBRT22
Polistina et al[18]2330 Gy/3Prior82.67.310.6None
Mahadevan et al[19]3924-36 Gy/3Sequential851520 from diagnosis9
Schellenberg et al[20]1625 Gy/1Sequential81911.4 from diagnosis47
Hoyer et al[21]2245 Gy/3Sequential574.85.7 from diagnosis18
Koong et al[22]1515-25 Gy/1No77211 from diagnosisNone
Chang et al[23]7725 Gy/1Prior84-11.4 from diagnosis13
Schellenberg et al[24]2025 Gy/1Sequential949.211.8 from diagnosis20
Rwigema et al[25]7118-25 Gy/1No64.8-10.310
Pollom et al[26]16725-33 Gy/1-5Sequential or concurrent--13.6 from diagnosis12.3
Moningi et al[27]8820-33 Gy/5Gemcitabine, cisplatin, FOLFIRINOX or paclitaxel-9.818.4 from diagnosis5.7 G23.4 G3
Gurka et al[28]3825-30 Gy/5Gemcitabine, mFOLFOX or capecitabine799.214.3 from diagnosis-
Present study2530-36 Gy/3 or 42-48Gy/44 patients, Gemcitabine--M0 group 13.5 M1 group 8.5 from SBRT4