Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2015; 21(25): 7659-7671
Published online Jul 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i25.7659
Published online Jul 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i25.7659
Table 4 Morphologic features of favorable and unfavorable T1 rectal cancers
| Favorable/low risk | Unfavorable/high risk |
| Well differentiated (G1-G2) | Poorly differentiated (G3) |
| SM 1 | SM 2-3 |
| Size < 3 cm | Size > 3 cm |
| < 40% wall circumferences | > 40% wall circumferences |
| No lymphovascular invasion | Lymphovascular invasion |
| No tumor budding | Tumor budding |
| No perineural invasion | Perineural invasion |
| No lymphocitic infiltration | Lymphocitic infiltration |
- Citation: Gaertner WB, Kwaan MR, Madoff RD, Melton GB. Rectal cancer: An evidence-based update for primary care providers. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(25): 7659-7671
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i25/7659.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i25.7659