Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2015; 21(23): 7289-7296
Published online Jun 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i23.7289
Published online Jun 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i23.7289
Ref. | Design | No. of cases | CBD stone diameter (mm) | Degree of EST | Balloon size (mm) | Complete stone removal overall, n (%) | Complete stone romoval initial, n (%) | No. sessions, mean | Application of ML, n (%) | PEP,n (%) | Bleeding,n (%) | Cholangitis, n (%) | Perforation, n (%) |
Ersoz et al[8], 2003 | Retrospective | 58 | 16/18, mean | Moderate | 12-20, range | 58/58 (100) | 48/58 (82.8) | 1.2 | 4/58 (6.9) | 2/58 (3.4) | 3/58 (5.2) | 2/58 (3.4) | 0/58 (0) |
Maydeo et al[9], 2007 | Prospective | 60 | 16, mean | Large | 12-15, mean | 60/60 (100) | 57/60 (95) | 1.0 | 3/60 (5) | 0/60 (0) | 1/60 (1.7) | 0/60 (0) | 0/60 (0) |
Heo et al[10], 2007 | Randmized controlled trial | 100 | 16, mean | Moderate | 12-20, range | 97/100 (97) | 83/100 (83) | 1.1 | 8/100 (8) | 4/100 (4) | 0/100 (0) | 0/100 (0) | 0/100 (0) |
Minami et al[11], 2007 | Retrospective | 88 | 14, mean | Small | 12-20, range | 87/88 (98.9) | 87/88 (98.9) | 1.0 | 1/88 (1.1) | 1/88 (1.1) | 1/88 (1.1) | 1/88 (1.1) | 0/88 (0) |
Misra et al[13], 2008 | Retrospective | 50 | 15-25, range | Adequate | 12-20, range | NA | NA | NA | 5/50 (10) | 4/50 (8) | 2/50 (4) | 0/50 (0) | 0/50 (0) |
Attasaranya et al[14], 2008 | Retrospective | 103 | 13, median | Discretion of endoscopist | 13.5, median | 102/107 (95.1) | 102/107 (95.1) | 1.0 | 28/103 (27.2) | 0/103 (0) | 2/103 (1.9) | 0/103 (0) | 1/103 (1) |
Itoi et al[15], 2009 | Retrospective | 53 | 14.8, mean | Moderate | 12-20, range | 53/53 (100) | 51/53 (96.2) | 1 | 3/53 (5.7) | 1/53 (1.9) | 0/53 (0) | 1/53 (1.9) | 0/53 (0) |
Jeong et al[16], 2009 | Retrospective | 38 | 17.7, mean | Not performed | 15-18, range | 37/38 (97.4) | 25/37 (65.8) | NA | 8/38 (21.1) | 1/38 (2.6) | 0/38 (0) | 0/38 (0) | 0/38 (0) |
Draganov et al[17], 2009 | Retrospective | 44 | 12.7, mean | Large | 10-15, range | 42/44 (95) | 37/44 (84) | 1.1 | 2/44 (4.5) | 0/44 (0) | 2/44 (4.5) | 1/44 (2.2) | 0/44 (0) |
Kim et al[18], 2009 | Randmized controlled trial | 27 | 20.8, mean | Small | 15-18, range | 27/27 (100) | 23/27 (85.2) | 1.3 | 9/27 (33.3) | 0/27 (0) | 0/27 (0) | 0/27 (0) | 0/27 (0) |
Stefanidis et al[22], 2011 | Randmized controlled trial | 45 | 12-20, range | Large | 12-20, range | 44/45 (97.8) | 44/45 (97.8) | 1.0 | 0/45 (0) | 1/45 (2.2) | 1/45 (2.2) | 0/45 (0) | 0/45 (0) |
Chan et al[23], 2011 | Retrospective | 247 | 16.4, mean | Not performed | 11-20, range | 229/247 (92.7) | 202/247 (81.8) | 1.2 | 39/247 (15.8) | 2/247 (0.8) | 6/247 (2.4) | 1/247 (0.4) | 0/247 (0) |
Kim et al[24], 2011 | Retrospective | 72 | 17.5, mean | Small | 12-20, range | 70/72 (97.2) | 63/72 (87.5) | 1.1 | 6/72 (8.3) | 5/72 (6.9) | 1/72 (1.3) | 0/72 (0) | 0/72 (0) |
Jang et al[25], 2013 | Retrospective | 40 | 10.5, median | Not performed | 10-17, range | 40/40 (100) | 37/40 (92.5) | 1.1 | 1/40 (2.5) | 2/40 (5.0) | 0/40 (0) | 0/40 (0) | 0/40 (0) |
Kogure et al[26], 2014 | Retrospective | 28 | 14, mean | Not performed | 12-18, range | 27/28 (96) | 25/28 (89) | 1.1 | 3/28 (11) | 1/28 (4) | 0/28 (0) | 0/28 (0) | 1/28 (4) |
Present study | Prospective | 41 | 13.4 mean | Not performed | 11-20, range | 40/41 (97.5) | 36/41 (87.8) | 1.2 | 5/41 (12.2) | 2/41 (4.9) | 0/41 (0) | 0/41 (0) | 1/41 (2.4) |
- Citation: Omuta S, Maetani I, Saito M, Shigoka H, Gon K, Tokuhisa J, Naruki M. Is endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation without endoscopic sphincterotomy effective? World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(23): 7289-7296
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i23/7289.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i23.7289