Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2015; 21(22): 6872-6883
Published online Jun 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.6872
Figure 2
Figure 2 Comparisons of co-localization signals of endoplasmic reticulum and a hepatitis B virus S surface antigen variant (KD) and wild-type hepatitis B virus S surface antigen (NOR) using confocal microscopy. A: Colocalization of the KD HBsAg variant (KD) and wild-type HBsAg (Nor) in the ER was visualized using confocal microscopy (Confocal A1, Nikon, Japan) after immunofluorescence double-staining assays. HuH-7 cells were transiently transfected with an empty vector (pIRES2-EGFP-Mock) or two different small hepatitis B virus S surface antigen (HBsAg) protein expression vectors (pIRES2-EGFP-Wild-type, pIRES2-EGFP-KD). Cells were harvested 2 d post-transfection, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and stained for HBsAg (green) and the ER marker calnexin (red). The blue color of the nucleus is DAPI staining. Scale bars represent 10, 20, and 50 μm; B: Colocalizations of the HBsAgs and ER in the cytoplasm were compared to each other using co-localization coefficients according to the lasso ROI selection. Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA. The average of the coefficients of ten images examined in a double-blinded manner is shown. (bP < 0.01 vs control).