Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2015; 21(22): 6794-6808
Published online Jun 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.6794
Published online Jun 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.6794
Table 1 Data derived from the main published studies that have tested correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values and pathological grade of hepatocellular carcinomas
Study | Number of patients | b values(s/mm2) | mean ADC value(× 10-3 mm2/s) |
Nasu et al[23] | 99 | 0, 500 | 1.45 (WD); 1.46 (MD); 1.36 (PD) |
Piana et al[24] | 99 | 0, 500 | 1.29 (WD); 1.22 (MD); 1.21 (PD) |
Saito et al[25] | 32 | 100, 800 | 1.25 (WD); 1.12 (MD); 1.13 (PD) |
Muhi et al[26] | 73 | 500, 800 | 0.91 (WD); 0.71 (MD); 0.68 (PD) |
Nishie et al[27] | 80 | 0, 500, 1000 | 1.21 (WD); 1.14 (MD); 0.76 (PD) |
Heo et al[28] | 27 | 0, 1000 | 1.20 (WD); 1.10 (MD); 0.90 (PD) |
Nakanishi et al[29] | 44 | 0, 50, 1000 | 1.29 (MD); 1.07 (PD) |
- Citation: De Robertis R, Tinazzi Martini P, Demozzi E, Puntel G, Ortolani S, Cingarlini S, Ruzzenente A, Guglielmi A, Tortora G, Bassi C, Pederzoli P, D’Onofrio M. Prognostication and response assessment in liver and pancreatic tumors: The new imaging. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(22): 6794-6808
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i22/6794.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.6794