Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2015; 21(20): 6352-6360
Published online May 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6352
Published online May 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6352
Ref. | Group | Drug | Definition of clinical response | Clinical response rate | Definition of clinical remission | Clinical remission rate | |
Feagan et al[14] | Intervention 1 | MLN-02 | An improvement of 3 points or more on the ulcerative colitis clinical score (modification of the Mayo Clinic Scoring system) | 66% | 59.3%1 | Ulcerative colitis clinical score of 0 or 1 and a modified Baron score of 0 or 1 with no evidence of rectal bleeding | 32.2%1 |
Intervention 2 | 53% | ||||||
Control | Placebo | 33% | 14.0% | ||||
Feagan et al[15] | Intervention | Vedolizumab | A reduction in the Mayo Clinic score of at least 3 points and a decrease of at least 30% from baseline, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of at least 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1 | 47.1% | Mayo Clinic score of 2 or lower and no subscore higher than 1, and mucosal healing, defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 | 16.9% | |
Control | Placebo | 25.5% | 5.4% | ||||
Parikh et al[16] | Intervention 1 | Vedolizumab | A decrease from baseline in the partial Mayo score (PMS) of ≥ 2 points and ≥ 25%, with an accompanying decrease in the subscore for rectal bleeding of ≥ 1 point or an absolute subscore for rectal bleeding of 0 or 1. | 50% | 56.8%1 | PMS of ≤ 2 with no individual subscore > 1 | 58%1 |
Intervention 2 | 63.3% | ||||||
Intervention 3 | 53.3% | ||||||
Control | Placebo | 33.3% | 50% |
- Citation: Jin Y, Lin Y, Lin LJ, Zheng CQ. Meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab for ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(20): 6352-6360
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i20/6352.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6352