Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2015; 21(2): 584-592
Published online Jan 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.584
Published online Jan 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.584
Table 4 Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis for posttransplant hepatitis B virus recurrence
Factor | Hazard ratio | 95%CI | P value | |
Age (yr) | 18-29 vs≥ 65 | 2.281 | 0.589-8.831 | 0.232 |
30-39 vs≥ 65 | 1.441 | 0.438-4.736 | 0.547 | |
40-49 vs≥ 65 | 1.910 | 0.603-6.057 | 0.272 | |
50-64 vs≥ 65 | 1.657 | 0.522-5.262 | 0.392 | |
Gender | Male vs Female | 1.092 | 0.687-1.737 | 0.710 |
Pre-LT MELD score | 6-9 vs 30-40 | 1.347 | 0.789-2.300 | 0.276 |
10-19 vs 30-40 | 1.226 | 0.767-1.958 | 0.395 | |
20-29 vs 30-40 | 1.034 | 0.613-1.744 | 0.899 | |
Pre-LT Child-Pugh score | 5-6 vs 10-15 | 0.921 | 0.584-1.452 | 0.723 |
7-9 vs 10-15 | 1.029 | 0.710-1.492 | 0.879 | |
Pre-LT with HCC | Yes vs No | 1.438 | 1.078-1.919 | 0.014 |
Pre-LT HBeAg status | Positive vs Negative | 1.176 | 0.956-1.772 | 0.325 |
Pre-LT serum HBV DNA level | ||||
HBV DNA | Positive vs Negative | 1.185 | 0.805-1.743 | 0.389 |
HBV DNA ≥ 105 copies/mL | Yes vs No | 1.395 | 1.012-1.921 | 0.042 |
Pre-LT antiviral therapy | ||||
Using LAM | Yes vs No | 0.930 | 0.697-1.241 | 0.622 |
Using ETV | Yes vs No | 0.133 | 0.019-0.949 | 0.044 |
Using ADV | Yes vs No | 0.328 | 0.046-2.333 | 0.265 |
Post-LT HBV prophylactic protocol | HBIG + LAM vs HBIG + ETV | 2.949 | 1.210-7.188 | 0.017 |
HBIG + ADV vs HBIG + ETV | 1.714 | 0.410-7.171 | 0.461 | |
Donor profiles | ||||
Donor source | Living donor vs Deceased donor | 0.900 | 0.500-1.621 | 0.726 |
Donor gender | Male vs Female | 0.564 | 0.298-1.067 | 0.078 |
Donor HBsAb positivity | Positive vs Negative | 0.481 | 0.267-0.864 | 0.014 |
Donor HBcAb positivity | Positive vs Negative | 1.598 | 0.786-3.247 | 0.195 |
- Citation: Shen S, Jiang L, Xiao GQ, Yan LN, Yang JY, Wen TF, Li B, Wang WT, Xu MQ, Wei YG. Prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation: A registry study. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(2): 584-592
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i2/584.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.584