Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2015; 21(2): 517-524
Published online Jan 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.517
Published online Jan 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.517
Table 1 Patients and ablation characteristics
Patient | Sex | Age (yr) | Tumor size (mm) | Tumor volume (cm3) | Ablation volume (cm3) | Registration | CBCT image quality | ||
CBCT | MDCT | Quality | Time (mo) | ||||||
1 | M | 71 | 30 | 13.0 | 40 | 32 | 2 | 3.9 | 3 |
2 | M | 63 | 25 | 8.5 | 10 | 12 | 1 | 3.3 | 2 |
3 | M | 74 | 32 | 16.0 | 37 | 55 | 3 | 3.4 | 1 |
4 | M | 74 | 35 | 22.0 | 77 | 69 | 3 | 3.3 | 3 |
5 | M | 55 | 40 | 36.0 | 58.5 | 46 | 2 | 6.3 | 3 |
6 | M | 46 | 15 | 3.0 | 12 | 7.5 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
7 | M | 46 | 30 | 14.0 | 38 | 30 | 3 | 8 | 2 |
8 | M | 46 | 12 | 2.5 | 30 | 32 | 3 | 8 | 2 |
9 | M | 68 | 30 | 13.5 | 33 | 59 | 3 | 4.2 | 2 |
10 | M | 65 | 14 | 3.0 | 10 | 17 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
11 | M | 86 | 8 | 0.5 | 58 | 38 | 1 | 7 | 2 |
12 | F | 68 | 20 | 5.0 | 4 | 13 | 1 | 5 | 2 |
13 | M | 60 | 15 | 3.5 | 47 | 34 | 1 | 8 | 2 |
14 | F | 56 | 30 | 13.0 | 32 | 38 | 3 | 7 | 3 |
15 | F | 84 | 22 | 6.0 | 10 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
16 | M | 54 | 35 | 27.0 | 95 | 124 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
17 | M | 81 | 24 | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
18 | F | 76 | 13 | 3.0 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
19 | F | 76 | 14 | 3.5 | 10 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
20 | M | 77 | 18 | 4.0 | 31 | 29 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
21 | M | 77 | 11 | 2.5 | 13 | 30 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
22 | F | 50 | 13 | 3.0 | 27 | 19 | 2 | 6 | 3 |
23 | M | 57 | 14 | 3.5 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 2 |
- Citation: Abdel-Rehim M, Ronot M, Sibert A, Vilgrain V. Assessment of liver ablation using cone beam computed tomography. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(2): 517-524
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i2/517.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.517